Log in
A A A
Racist NT X rated Bans PDF  | Print |  E-mail
Written by Staff | ASP   
Friday, 27 November 2009 14:48

Government Porn Bans in NT May be Illegal

Jenny Macklin’s refusal to end racially discriminatory bans on the possession of X rated films and other erotic material on Aboriginal communities in the NT, might be tested in the courts. The Eros Association is seeking legal advice on whether the continuing bans on so-called ‘pornography’ represent legitimate ‘special measures’.

Eros CEO, Fiona Patten, said that X18+ films, as well as Category 1 and 2 Restricted publications, were classified by the Minister’s own Commonwealth Classification Board and the Commonwealth’s Classification Act stated unequivocally that these products were suitable for all adult Australians to import, sell, purchase and possess. “If Jenny Macklin wants to keep these racist bans in place, she should amend Australia’s Classification Act to state that Australians of Aboriginal extract can be exempted from it’s provisions. Otherwise the Classification Act is at odds with the legislative measures taken in the NT”, she said.

Ms Patten said that no other country in the world had ever banned the sale of classified erotica to its indigenous people and the Racial Discrimination Act implemented Australia’s international obligations under the Convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination. “Banning sexual or erotic material from indigenous people is seen as something 19th century Christian missionaries would try”, she said.  “Even prisoners in Australian jails can officially access Category 1 Restricted publications”.

She said that the government had no research whatsoever that showed that sexual abuse in the NT was in any way related to the possession of classified adult material.  “Without any official statistics from court reports or other crime research to back these bans, Ms Macklin is guilty of continuing the patronising and nannying of NT Aborigines that John Howard started. She is saying that they sexually assault each other after reading adult magazines that are freely available in newsagents around the country”.

The original ‘Little Children’ report that initiated the intervention, specifically rejected bans on adult material and called for more education from the federal government about the proper use of adult material.

Comments
Search
Only registered users can write comments!

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 
ASP eNewsletter
31.07.10
yes sex party did get the G spot in WA
31.07.10
RT @kcarruthers: equal rights for atheists #ausvotes // #vote1sex
31.07.10
The @aussexparty crew at the Vic Markets - "Say Senate!" http://twitpic.com/2a682f #vote1sex #ausvotes
30.07.10
Sex party senators is it too early celebrate http://tweetphoto.com/35683146
30.07.10
30.07.10
We brought good luck cupcakes for all http://tweetphoto.com/35682307
30.07.10
Lucky last is steven mayne
30.07.10
@citizen_cam yes we r
30.07.10
We r 9th on the ballot paper btwn shooters and climate skeptics
30.07.10
Sex party #1 on la trove ballot
30.07.10
It's not one of our blindfolds no leather
30.07.10
21 groups for vic senate 60 candidates
30.07.10
We r #13 in first part of draw http://tweetphoto.com/35674923
30.07.10
The senate whiteboard the draw begins lady about to b blindfolded
30.07.10
just had my first autograph collector request!
29.07.10
@elizabethdanger no local candidates, but you will be able to vote for us in the senate in VIC.
29.07.10
@elizabethdanger what electorate do you live in?
29.07.10
Bring on the debate! @aussexparty's Fiona Patten vs Family First's Wendy Francis at 7:15 AM, Monday morning on Sunrise.

Latest News

Technogenics

RTA - Restricted to adults



Authorised by Robert Swan, 10 Ipswich Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609.

Australian Sex Party